English review

Full name of reviewer (required)

E-mail address (required)

Number of the review (required)

The article meets all the requirements and is printable
The article contains some errors, but after making the suggested corrections, it can be accepted for publication
The article contains some errors and after making the suggested corrections, it should be re-reviewed
The article does not meet the academic criteria
This article does not coincide with the interests / specialisation of the reviewer

The title does not reflect the content enough
The article is too long
The article is too short
It contains unnecessary footnotes
It lacks the appropriate footnotes
It brings too little new information to the discussed issues
It uses works of other authors in an unacceptable way
The opinions expressed in it are not sufficiently justified
It is incorrect in terms of language
It is not drafted clearly enough

DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF THE ARTICLE (scale from 1 to 5; where 1 is the lowest level, and 5 is the highest one):
In terms of clarity of argumentation, I mark the article:
In terms of reliability and accuracy, I mark the article:
In terms of the appropriate use of the literature, I mark the article:
In terms of originality, I mark the article:
In terms of linguistic correctness, I mark the article:


If you want to attach an electronic version of the article with added notes/comments, please click on the button below and select the file located on your computer. The file cannot be larger than 1 megabyte. Only the following formats are allowed: doc, docx (Microsoft); pdf (Adobe); odt (OpenOffice). In case of any problems, please contact the editorial team at: redakcja@indigena.edu.pl

Please validate all input data one more time and, in the absence of any amendments, click on the button below to submit the review to the editorial team. Please be reminded the articles are subject to the double-blind review process.

In order to submit a review, it is necessary to copy the following security code correctly.